Loading source
Pulling the file list, source metadata, and syntax-aware rendering for this listing.
Source from repo
Executes implementation plans by dispatching isolated subagents per task with two-stage spec and code quality review.
Files
Skill
Size
Entrypoint
Format
Open file
Syntax-highlighted preview of this file as included in the skill package.
spec-reviewer-prompt.md
1# Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template23Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.45**Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)67```8Task tool (general-purpose):9description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"10prompt: |11You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.1213## What Was Requested1415[FULL TEXT of task requirements]1617## What Implementer Claims They Built1819[From implementer's report]2021## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report2223The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,24inaccurate, or optimistic. You MUST verify everything independently.2526**DO NOT:**27- Take their word for what they implemented28- Trust their claims about completeness29- Accept their interpretation of requirements3031**DO:**32- Read the actual code they wrote33- Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line34- Check for missing pieces they claimed to implement35- Look for extra features they didn't mention3637## Your Job3839Read the implementation code and verify:4041**Missing requirements:**42- Did they implement everything that was requested?43- Are there requirements they skipped or missed?44- Did they claim something works but didn't actually implement it?4546**Extra/unneeded work:**47- Did they build things that weren't requested?48- Did they over-engineer or add unnecessary features?49- Did they add "nice to haves" that weren't in spec?5051**Misunderstandings:**52- Did they interpret requirements differently than intended?53- Did they solve the wrong problem?54- Did they implement the right feature but wrong way?5556**Verify by reading code, not by trusting report.**5758Report:59- ✅ Spec compliant (if everything matches after code inspection)60- ❌ Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]61```62